Drunk driving is allegedly placed on investigation for dangerous driving

In order to ensure the correct implementation of the "Criminal Law Amendment (8)" and further regulate public security organs' enforcement of drunk driving and driving motor vehicle crimes, the Ministry of Public Security recently issued the "Guiding Opinions on Public Security Organs Handling Drunk Driving Motor Vehicle Criminal Cases". , to further standardize on-site investigations, deadlines for handling cases, filing investigations, etc. The “Opinions” require strict blood sample extraction conditions. The traffic police found that the motor vehicle driver was suspected of having a drunk driving motor vehicle. He immediately conducted a breath alcohol test and he disagreed with the drunk driving motor vehicle and the party’s breath alcohol test results. Anyone who refuses to cooperate with the Breath Alcohol Test or other methods of testing and suspected of drinking alcohol or drunk driving a motor vehicle in traffic accidents shall immediately take blood samples to test blood alcohol content. The Opinion emphasizes that criminal evidence should be fixed in a timely manner. On-the-spot investigation records should be made on the process of seizing drunk driving motor vehicle suspects, breath alcohol testing, and blood sampling. If conditions permit, they should also be photographed, recorded, or recorded. Records; witnesses on the spot shall collect witness statements in a timely manner. The "Opinions" pointed out that it is necessary to strictly control the standards for filing cases, and that all those who have been tested for drunk driving motor vehicles with blood alcohol content are to be investigated for alleged dangerous driving. After the parties have been seized, in order to evade legal prosecution, and drink alcohol before the breath alcohol test or blood samples are drawn, the blood alcohol content of the drunk driving vehicle should be investigated for investigation. The parties were tested for breath alcohol by reaching drunk driving motor standards, which escaped before taking a blood sample, based on an expiratory alcohol content test. The "Opinions" clarified that it is necessary to do a good job of connecting the cases. After the conclusion of the Case investigation, the facts of drunk driving motor vehicle crimes are clear and the evidence is clear and sufficient. Before the case is transferred to the People's Procuratorate for examination and prosecution, the criminal suspects' motor vehicles are revoked according to law. certificate. The Opinions require strengthening the management of case handling by law enforcement, further clarifying the requirements for handling cases, clarifying the handling standards and handling procedures of key links such as breath alcohol testing, blood sample extraction and custody, improving the informatization level of case handling, vigorously implementing online case handling, and strengthening online monitoring. And assessment. The Opinions also require that the procedures for investigation and handling be perfected. When traffic policemen inspect drunk driving motor vehicles on roads, they must ensure the personal safety of the police, clarify the inspection and investigation procedures of the police, and implement safety protection measures to prevent the occurrence of civilian police injuries.